Guide · CERT-In 6-hour reporting

The six-hour clock starts when you notice.
Not when you’re ready.

CERT-In’s 2022 direction requires listed cyber security incidents to be reported within 6 hours of noticing them, or of being brought to notice. Most of that window gets spent assembling facts that could have been captured the moment the incident was detected.

This guide sets out what the direction actually says, the workflow that fits inside six hours, and which parts of it can be automated. The obligation is yours — automation shortens the evidence work; it does not transfer the duty.

s.70B(6) · IT Act 200020 reportable incident types180-day logs, in India
Incident clock · Reportable eventARMED
5h 46mremaining · detected T+00:14
Detection timestamp captured from NTP-synced clock
Scope & affected systems correlated
Evidence bundle assembled from 180-day log store
Report drafted — awaiting CISO approval
Filing deadlineT+6h 00m · from time of noticing
The direction

Six obligations. One of them has a clock.

Direction No. 20(3)/2022-CERT-In, dated 28 April 2022, issued under sub-section (6) of section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and effective 60 days after issue. It applies to service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporate and Government organisations.

Report within 6 hours

Incidents listed in Annexure I must be reported within 6 hours of noticing them or being brought to notice. Reportable to CERT-In by email (incident@cert-in.org.in), phone (1800-11-4949) or fax (1800-11-6969).

Synchronised clocks

All ICT system clocks must sync to the NTP servers of NIC or NPL, or to servers traceable to them. Estates spanning multiple geographies may use another accurate standard time source, provided it does not deviate from NPL and NIC.

180 days of logs, held in India

Logs of all ICT systems must be enabled and maintained securely for a rolling period of 180 days, within Indian jurisdiction — and provided to CERT-In alongside any incident report, or when directed.

A designated point of contact

A PoC must be designated to interface with CERT-In, submitted in the Annexure II format to info@cert-in.org.in and kept updated. Every CERT-In communication seeking information goes to that contact.

Assistance when directed

On order or direction, entities must provide information or assistance in the format specified — up to and including near real-time — within the timeframe specified. Missing it is treated as non-compliance.

Five-year subscriber records

Data centres, VPS providers, cloud service providers and VPN providers must register and hold validated subscriber details for 5 years. Virtual asset providers hold KYC and transaction records for the same period.

Failure to furnish information, or non-compliance with the direction, may invite punitive action under sub-section (7) of section 70B of the IT Act, 2000, and other laws as applicable.
Annexure I

The 20 incident types that must be reported.

If an incident falls in this list, the six-hour clock applies. Note the first entry — targeted scanning or probing of critical networks is reportable, well before anything is breached.

Targeted scanning/probing of critical networks/systems
Compromise of critical systems/information
Unauthorised access of IT systems/data
Defacement of website or intrusion into a website and unauthorised changes
Malicious code attacks — virus, worm, Trojan, bots, spyware, ransomware, cryptominers
Attack on servers such as database, mail and DNS, and network devices such as routers
Identity theft, spoofing and phishing attacks
Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks
Attacks on critical infrastructure, SCADA, operational technology systems and wireless networks
Attacks on applications such as e-governance and e-commerce
Data breach
Data leak
Attacks on Internet of Things (IoT) devices and associated systems, networks, software, servers
Attacks or incidents affecting digital payment systems
Attacks through malicious mobile apps
Fake mobile apps
Unauthorised access to social media accounts
Attacks or malicious/suspicious activities affecting cloud computing systems, servers, software, applications
Attacks affecting systems related to big data, blockchain, virtual assets, robotics, 3D and 4D printing, additive manufacturing, drones
Attacks or malicious/suspicious activities affecting systems related to artificial intelligence and machine learning

Source: Annexure I, Direction No. 20(3)/2022-CERT-In, 28 April 2022. CERT-In publishes methods and formats for reporting on cert-in.org.in and updates them from time to time — check the current format before filing.

Why the window is hard

Six hours is not the problem. Reconstruction is.

The window is rarely missed because someone forgot to file. It is missed because the facts a filing needs — when it was noticed, what it touched, what was done — are scattered across teams and consoles, and get assembled by hand under pressure.

Reconstructed after the fact
Captured at detection
The clock starts at “noticing” — but nobody can say when that was, because the first signal sat in one team’s console before anyone escalated it.
The detection timestamp is recorded at ingest from NTP-synced clocks, and becomes the start of an immutable record.
Scope is assembled by asking each owner what their system saw, in a bridge call that competes with actually containing the incident.
Affected systems, data types and blast radius are correlated automatically from signals already flowing through the platform.
Evidence is pulled from whichever logs still exist, at whatever retention each team happened to configure.
Evidence is drawn from a 180-day log store held in Indian jurisdiction, already in the shape the direction expects.
The report is written from scratch, by the person who best understands the incident — the same person you need working on containment.
The report is pre-filled from the evidence trail, leaving the responder to verify and the CISO to approve.
Nobody is certain the filing went to the right place, or that the PoC details on record are current.
Filing routes to the registered point of contact, and the submission itself is logged as evidence.
The workflow

What has to happen inside the six hours.

A sequence that fits the window — each step producing the input the next one needs, so that the filing is a review rather than a writing exercise.

T+0

Notice, and timestamp it

The moment a signal meets the Annexure I definition, record the time of noticing against an NTP-synced clock. This timestamp is the one the deadline is measured from, so it is the one that has to be defensible.

T+minutes

Classify against Annexure I

Decide whether the incident is one of the 20 reportable types. Targeted scanning of critical systems qualifies — the threshold is lower than most escalation policies assume.

T+minutes

Establish scope and data exposure

Determine affected systems, whether personal data was involved, and which principals are implicated. This is also what a DPDP breach assessment needs, so do it once and use it twice.

T+minutes

Preserve and bundle the evidence

Freeze the relevant slice of the 180-day log store, along with indicators, the timeline and actions taken. The direction requires logs to accompany the report or be produced on direction.

T+hours

Draft in the current CERT-In format

Populate the published reporting format from the evidence trail rather than from memory. Formats are updated from time to time — pull the current one rather than reusing last year's template.

Before T+6h

Approve, file, and log the filing

The accountable officer reviews and approves; the report goes to CERT-In through email, phone or fax, from or via the registered point of contact. Log the submission — the filing is itself evidence of compliance.

Division of labour

Automate the assembly. Keep the judgement.

Everything mechanical about a filing — timestamps, scope, evidence, drafting — is machine work. Everything consequential about it stays with a person who is accountable for it.

1

Machine: capture

Detection time, affected systems, indicators and actions recorded as they happen, not reconstructed later

2

Machine: assemble

Evidence bundled from the log store; the report pre-filled in the current published format

3

Human: verify

The responder confirms the classification, the scope and what the narrative says happened

4

Human: approve & own

The accountable officer signs off and files. The obligation was never delegable

The duty to report is the entity’s, not a vendor’s. No platform makes you compliant on its own — what automation changes is how much of the six hours is spent on clerical reconstruction instead of on the incident.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the CERT-In 6-hour reporting rule?

Direction No. 20(3)/2022-CERT-In, issued on 28 April 2022 under sub-section (6) of section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, requires service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporate and Government organisations to report the cyber security incidents listed in its Annexure I to CERT-In within 6 hours of noticing them or of being brought to notice.

When does the 6-hour clock start?

At the point of noticing the incident, or of being brought to notice about it — not at the point of confirming its full scope, and not when remediation finishes. This is why the detection timestamp matters: it is the fact the deadline is measured from, and it needs to come from a synchronised clock rather than someone's recollection.

Which incidents must be reported to CERT-In within 6 hours?

Annexure I lists 20 types, including targeted scanning or probing of critical networks and systems, compromise of critical systems, unauthorised access to IT systems or data, website defacement, malicious code attacks including ransomware, attacks on servers and network devices, phishing and identity theft, DoS and DDoS attacks, attacks on critical infrastructure and SCADA, data breach, data leak, attacks on IoT devices, attacks affecting digital payment systems, fake or malicious mobile apps, unauthorised access to social media accounts, and attacks affecting cloud, big data, blockchain, virtual asset, drone, and artificial intelligence and machine learning systems.

How are incidents reported to CERT-In?

The direction names email (incident@cert-in.org.in), phone (1800-11-4949) and fax (1800-11-6969). CERT-In publishes the methods and formats for reporting on cert-in.org.in and updates them from time to time, so the current published format should be used rather than a stored copy. Separately, a designated point of contact must be registered with CERT-In in the Annexure II format and kept updated.

What log retention does CERT-In require?

Logs of all ICT systems must be enabled and maintained securely for a rolling period of 180 days, and maintained within Indian jurisdiction. They must be provided to CERT-In along with the reporting of any incident, or when ordered or directed.

Can CERT-In incident reporting be automated?

The evidence work can be: capturing the detection timestamp against a synchronised clock, correlating affected systems and data exposure, assembling the log evidence, and pre-filling the current reporting format. The judgement and the accountability cannot — classification, verification and approval remain with the people answerable for them, and the reporting obligation stays with the entity rather than transferring to any platform or vendor.

What happens if an incident is not reported within 6 hours?

The direction states that failure to furnish information, or non-compliance with the direction, may invite punitive action under sub-section (7) of section 70B of the IT Act, 2000, and other laws as applicable.

Ready before the next incident

Arm the clock before you need it.

A scoped PoC on your own estate — evidence collection, the incident clock, and a filing rehearsed against your real systems.

Guidance here summarises the published direction and is not legal advice; confirm current formats and obligations with CERT-In and your counsel.